
01 / 06
Process model and evidence gates
See progress, required evidence, blockers, and the path through the workflow.
A governed product engineering platform for moving safety-critical systems from early concept through safety analysis, cybersecurity work, traceability, evidence, and compliance readiness.
Each view shows one part of the same governed workflow: context, analysis, requirements, rationale, and attributable approvals.

01 / 06
See progress, required evidence, blockers, and the path through the workflow.

02 / 06
Manage imported requirements, review state, versioning, and traceability.

03 / 06
Review structured hazards, severity, exposure, controllability, and ASIL decisions.

04 / 06
Carry approved HARA decisions forward into safety goals with explicit links.

05 / 06
Inspect the rationale, source references, and confidence behind generated fields.

06 / 06
Keep approvals, changes, sources, and decisions attributable and reviewable.
Unlock the short walkthrough after sharing your contact details.

A short look at the governed engineering workflow.
Estimate how much engineering time can be recovered when drafting, review state, traceability, evidence reuse, and gap analysis move into one governed workflow.
Planning model only, not a guarantee. Use real loaded team costs and conservative assumptions for pilot decisions.
Default planning assumption: 3 hours recovered per person per week. It reflects time commonly spent in Excel-based status chasing, assembling evidence, maintaining trace links, and preparing reviews. This is conservative internal planning data—not validated performance data—and pilots will verify it against the Excel baseline.
Annual savings
€100,320
Monthly value
€8,360
Time recovered
1,056h
At 6 review cycles per month, structured review and evidence flows can expose roughly 864 coordination hours per year for reduction or redeployment.
Review pilot valueIt is not a blank chat interface. It is a governed workflow engine built around item definition, HARA, TARA, requirements, and review control.
Bring in specifications, requirements, prior analyses, and other reference material so the platform works from your actual project context.
Set up the item, system, or device context with scope, boundaries, operating conditions, and the supporting information the workflow needs.
Generate the first pass for the active workflow, then fill gaps, refine the content, and edit directly in the workspace until it reflects the team's judgment.
Review each row, approve what is ready, and keep the next stage tied only to work that has actually been checked.
Use approved work to produce goals, requirements, controls, and related outputs while keeping ownership, manager review, and team access in place.
See how Aegis SafeForge supports HARA, safety goals, requirements, review control, and traceability.
Explore TARA, cybersecurity goals, controls, claims, and evidence workflows.
Read platform-focused posts on safety, security, AI governance, and Aegis SafeForge workflows.
See how Aegis SafeForge connects AI suggestions, deterministic checks, and review workflows.
Three deployment tiers. Pricing is scoped to your workflow, data boundary, and support needs.
Pilot
For focused evaluation teams validating one workflow, one dataset, and named reviewers.
Team
For engineering teams expanding governed safety and cybersecurity work across shared projects.
Enterprise / Private Deployment
For organizations that need enterprise controls, private cloud, VPC, or self-hosted deployment discussions.
All plans include the Aegis SafeForge analysis engine. Pricing is provided after a workflow and deployment fit review.
Newsletter
Get product notes, event invites, and practical safety engineering articles when we publish them.
Alpha, Limited Availability
Aegis SafeForge is currently available to a limited number of early access partners. Get in touch to discuss access, onboarding, and fit for your team.
Request pilot access